اتصال به اینترنت شما ضعیف یا قطع است.

Price and purchase of High Voltage Aluminum Cable + Cheap sale

In comparing the aluminum conductor and the copper conductor cable, the copper was always a better conductor but what about the high voltage power transmission used in underground, can it beat the copper? Which one will be the winner? In this article we will discuss this matter. The electrification of the world is being facilitated in large part by the installation of electricity cables buried underground. Copper's high conductivity would seem to make it the material of choice for the conductor, therefore it's not surprising that it is. On the other hand, this is not always the case. When a thorough life cycle analysis (LCA) is performed, the experience gained from France's transmission grid has demonstrated that aluminum may on occasion prove to be the preferable choice. When deciding on a conductor for an underground cable system, there are a lot of different factors that need to be taken into consideration. Considerations pertaining to electricity, thermal design, methods of installation, mechanical tensions, and so on are some examples of these. Not only the cost of the cable's initial purchase but also the total cost of maintaining and running the cable over the length of its lifetime, is a crucial consideration. At the early stage of cable design, environmental impact is another issue that is becoming an increasingly essential consideration.

  • ELECTRICAL RESISTANCE

Because of their high conductivity, copper (Cu) and aluminum (Al) are the only two metals that are utilized in the production of underground cables. Silver is the best metal for conducting electricity, despite popular belief to the contrary. Unpredictably, gold comes in at the third spot, right after copper, with aluminum coming in at the fourth spot. Copper has an electrical conductivity that is significantly higher than that of aluminum by a factor of 1.64. However, it is over three times heavier and has a significantly higher price tag. Copper prices are subject to significant swings; yet, there have been periods in this century when the price of copper was five times higher than the price of aluminum. Because of these considerations, a conductor made of aluminum must be larger in order to carry the same amount of current as one made of copper. Despite this, the aluminum cable can be purchased at a lower cost and is easier to work with than copper cable. A few modifications are available, such as enamelled copper wiring (CUE) or oxidized aluminum wires.

  • EXPERIENCE WORKING ON THE GRID IN FRANCE

It is interesting to keep track of how each conductor performs in comparison to the others. One illustration shows that a 2500 sqmm Al cable has a rating that is very near to the same as a 2000 sqmm Cu cable. The conductor accounts for the majority of the energy that is lost in an underground cable due to losses. The typical cumulative losses suffered by cables after installation in France, expressed as a function of the current rating of the cables. The curves terminate at the steady-state permitted current rating, which is associated with the highest temperature that the insulation material can withstand (for XLPE, which stands for cross-linked polyethylene, this temperature is 90 degrees Celsius). The magnitude is equal to 30 Watts per meter of cable. The French transmission system operator, Réseau de Transport d'Electricité (RTE), has produced statistics showing that underground cable systems operate more than 95% of the time at a current rating that is lower than 60% of their maximum rating. These statistics can be found in the article "Transmission System Statistics." This indicates that the losses are often a significant amount lower than their highest potential worth. The remaining 5% of the running time corresponds with the peak values and conditions that are the most restrictive, such as when there is a particularly harsh winter and a significant amount of electrical heating is used. The conclusion that can be drawn from this is that the operating circumstances of an underground cable are typically those that result in "acceptable" losses. This is an extremely important consideration, given that power losses account for the vast majority of the environmental effect caused by the cable. If the cable is run at a point that is closer to its full capacity, then the environmental imprint will be larger, and the cost to operate the cable would be higher.

  • ECONOMICAL DESIGN OF WIRE AND CABLE CONDUCTORS

When building a cable system, the goal is to keep the current rating within the parameters set by the thermal behavior of the system. In every possible mode of operation, the cable is constructed so that its temperature will never rise above the insulating layer's threshold for safe operation. The majority of the time, the design engineer will choose the size of the conductor that satisfies the required operating temperature while maintaining a margin of safety within a broad range of standardized sizes. Up until very recently, it was thought that this technique provided the best return on investment (ROI). On the other hand, the actual cost of the energy losses contributes to the total cost of a power link on a worldwide scale. It's possible that a larger conductor, while initially more expensive to buy, will generate lower losses than the conductor that was built for thermal efficiency. As a result, it has the potential to become substantially more cost-effective after a few decades have passed. The cost of losses goes down when there is less electrical resistance, while the investment costs go up as the conductor size increases. Both of these tendencies, when combined, produce curves in the shape of a U, which correspond to the ideal conductor size. In the given scenario, a conductor with 1600 square millimeters of aluminum is the most cost-efficient option for transmitting 700 amperes over a period of 50 years. However, 630 square millimeters of aluminum would have been chosen if the thermal design had been more stringent. This optimization isn't just concerned with financial matters, either. The reduced amount of waste produced is also beneficial in terms of the impact on the environment. The benefits can include a reduced danger of thermal aging, a decreased risk of thermal runaway owing to uncontrolled soil drying, a wider safety margin to manage load peaks or unexpected hot patches, margins for overloads, and a variety of other advantages. In addition, reduced losses contribute to the mitigation of global warming.

  • WHAT THE FUTURE HOLDS IN STORE FOR VERY LARGE ALUMINUM CONDUCTORS

Some manufacturers are now offering new solutions with aluminum conductors of 3000sqmm or 4000sqmm, pushing the present limits of copper conductors. While the maximum standardised cross-sections of conductors have moved from 1600 to 2500sqmm within the past few years, the maximum standardised cross-sections of conductors have moved from 1600 to 2500sqmm. Research has been conducted out to investigate the level of interest in these enormous components in terms of their performance, installation, economics, and the impact they have on the environment. They demonstrate that, for a given current rating, a cable with a very big conductor made of aluminum creates less energy losses than a cable with a smaller conductor made of copper that is comprised of either one or two sections. Despite the higher cost of installation, significant savings may be possible due to the reduced initial investment cost of the aluminum cables that were produced as a result. After then, design engineers are tasked with striking a balance between the desirable overall cost and a variety of other constraints. These include an increase in the amount of civil works required, conductors that are more rigid and have a lower strength to resist pulling during installation, an increased size of drums or a lower delivery length on site, which results in shorter sections and an increase in the number of cable joints. A greater conductor diameter necessitates using accessories that are of a larger size as well. The fact that there is currently no expertise in terms of the qualification of such enormous cable systems is maybe the most significant barrier that must be overcome. In order to meet the demands of this obstacle, manufacturers and utilities will need to work together. At the conductor diameters employed today, however, there is a large amount of actual experience indicating quite clearly that aluminum constitutes an important alternative to copper. This evidence comes in the form of clear evidence.

How useful is this article to you?

Average Score 5 / Number of votes: 1

Comments (0 Comments)

💰 Tenfold your income 💎